Showing posts with label Financial. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Financial. Show all posts

Voice from an insurance agent

2 comments - Post a comment

Dear Mr. Tan,
As im currently a new agent with one of the big insurance companies in Singapore, im finding its a lot different from what I was told or expected.
For example at the start we were told to emphasize needs based selling in order to meet the needs of our clients (basically what the MAS regulations said). Later I found out that nobody does needs based selling and all we do is get clients to sign on empty forms so we can go back to the office to fill them up later. End result : Client is clueless about what their needs are and how we are meeting them, if at all. Instead of talking to them about what THEY want, we spend our time giving presentations about interest rates and talking about how our relative racked up a huge hospital bill without insurance to pay for it.

The commission structure is also highly flawed and contributes to the high turnover rate of agents in the industry. There is absolutely zero incentive or point for agents to recommend products with lower commission rates. In fact, meeting a client to sell a term plan actually loses an agent money(unless it is a very big term plan) because the commission rate is simply not high enough to pay for the time + bus/MRT fare involved.

In my case, neither I or my colleagues were ever given product training on anything but the products with the highest commission rates. Also, this is actually a job that requires you to spend money in order to make money. The problem is that for most new agents, they will not be able to set sufficient appointments or close enough cases to make money for the first 1-2 months at least, unless they have a lot of contacts who are interested. The end result is they spend hundreds of dollars in food and transport expenses, and in the end all they keep hearing is “I’m not interested”, and quit because they are heavily in the red and still can’t find people who wants to buy insurance. It would be better if new agents were given a basic allowance of $400-500 for living expenses till they are seasoned enough to close cases on a regular basis.

With the high turnover rate of agents in the industry there is a high incentive to simply not train agents properly since a manager is spending too much time training someone who, according to statistics, will quit in a month or two anyway. Simply give them basic training, send them on whatever appointments they can make, and see if it works out. If not, oh well, go recruit more people. I was given a few days of training total, only a few hours of which was product related, and was told to go to my first appointment with the aim to do a presentation and simply convince him to buy and not ask questions. I ended up making stuff up when the client started asking about things I was not taught about. I felt pathetic.

As it is I am currently in the unenviable situation where I spend money travelling back and fro my office, making phone calls, doing surveys, doing coldcalls, mainly to hear phones ringing that people never seem to pick up (I never had any idea how under-utilzied handphones were in Singapore before) and I am not even able to set a single appointment because people keep postponing or simply dissapear off the radar and never pick up their phones again. All of this is costing me money and worst of all I cannot see a way to improve my situation. I do not have any senior agents I can look to for guidance since they are all busy rushing to meet quotas and my manager just keeps telling me to go out, do more surveys, make more phone calls, find and meet people, etc, but it is simply not working.

I have no clue where, exactly, I am supposed to find people interested in buying insurance or doing investments since almost everyone i meet simply recoils in horror at the mere mention of “savings” “investments” “protection” or any other key word that you can possibly use.

A scary amount of middle aged adults still believe themselves immortal and that they cannot possibly get hospitalized or worse, affecting their ability to provide for their family. Most young working adults simply go from paycheck to paycheck, saving $0 every month and heading straight for disaster the moment a situation calls for usage of emergency funds which do not exist, or they just dump a token amount into their bank account every month that dissapears into the newest xbox or ipod the moment they get enough. Most young working adults do not even have a clue what medishield or medisave is, other than that it is something CPF related.

I feel like im constantly rolling dice and seeing if I can get a lucky combination just to find a single interested person. I would like to continue on in this line of advising people on financial planning, but I do not see how as most people simply want to go through life without any financial planning or insurance protection at all. And actually I don’t even know whether what im doing can be considered financial planning anyway.

Source.

This is a very typical but unheard of voices among the insurance agents in Singapore where the commission structure present a conflict of interest. Its an open secret only to the minority who belongs to the financial savvy group. We often heard of people having no time to do their own research and planning, hence they just leave it to the financial planners thinking they have the knowledge and skills necessary. This might be true but in reality, it is hardly the case if the adviser is skewed towards making enough money just to put food on the table. In this scenario, they would be more likely to recommend products (Whole Life, Endowment, ILP etc) that are not in your interest because the commissions are huge; imagine 90% of your first year premium goes to the pretty/handsome adviser.

My advise is to at least read up what insurance you might need and ask your adviser for comments. I favored IFA (Independent financial adviser) over tied-agents as the former has more sources; however whether he/she has the expertise to filter out the bad ones is subject to individual.

 

How are financial companies helping consumers?

No Comment - Post a comment

Contributed article from someone who came across my blog.

Debt consolidation companies have gained increased prominence owing to the fact that they have helped many debtors to become debt free. Debt consolidation is undoubtedly a good debt solution but you have to play your part too. Once you enroll for a debt consolidation program, it is important to take the process to completion and not leave it midway.

You seek professional assistance only when you are in a financial mess. There are times when you don’t mess up your finances but your circumstances force you to. Under such circumstances you can take help of a credit counselor who can suggest ways to regain financial stability again.

When you consolidate your multiple debts into one with the help of a debt consolidation company, the firm you are hiring will take care of your debts. The company will negotiate with your creditors on your behalf and convince them to reduce rate of interest. If the interest rate is reduced, the amount you are paying each month is also lowered. You will also get a repayment schedule that will enable you to keep track of your payments and your payments become more organized and structured.

The debt consolidation companies may be for-profit or non-profit making firms. Once you enroll for a debt consolidation program, make sure you don’t miss your payments again. This can be very troubling and can land you in serious trouble. Studies reveal that approximately 30% to 60% debtors in United States don’t repay their debts.

However, lately there are many debt consolidation companies that have come under the spotlight. And this time due to the wrong reasons. The Federal Trade Commission, state regulators and attorney generals have received several complaints from the consumers that there are few debt consolidation companies that are taking debtors for a ride. These debt help firms promise you that they will be able to help you get out of debt but in reality they fail to live up to their promises.

In majority of the cases, it has been observed that debt consolidation firms charge very high upfront fees; they make verbal promises and avoid writing down their services in paper. The incidence of debtors dropping out of the program isn’t uncommon and when they do so, debtors lose all their cash.

However, not all debt consolidation companies operate illegally and if you intend to hire the services of a debt consolidation company, make sure you check the Reliability report of the Better Business Bureau.

 

Structured Notes

No Comment - Post a comment

Did you or any of your close friends/relatives/family members bought the structured notes few years ago and are now suffering deep paper losses?

Several investors have suggested that a petition to be sent to the Prime Minister to ask him to get the banks to offer compensation similar to Hong Kong, namely 60% now and 40% of the proceeds at maturity.

You can view/sign the petition here. Still some way to go before reaching the quota of 1000 signatures though.

 

10 barred from notes sale

No Comment - Post a comment

Definitely one of the biggest punishment for FIs in Singapore. They deserve it!

THE Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) has barred 10 financial institutions here which sold toxic credit notes linked to the collapsed US investment bank Lehman Brothers from selling new structured notes for between six months and a minimum of two years.

The unprecedented MAS directive followed its investigations into complaints of mis-selling of the Lehman-linked structured notes from investors in Singapore who lost money last year in the aftermath of the Lehman Brothers collapse.

The central bank probe found the 10 financial institutions had in place procedures and controls for the approval and sales of the notes.

However, the level of internal controls differed. As a result there were various forms of failings on the part of the FIs in the sale of the notes, said MAS which released the findings of its investigations on Tuesday.

Some of the failings include assigning inconsistent risk ratings to some series of the Notes that were inconsistent with risk warnings stated in the prospectus and pricing statement; insufficient steps to ensure sales staff were properly trained to sell the notes and weaknesses in how some FIs equipped staff with accurate and complete information about the products.

MAS has ordered the 10 FIs to stop selling new structured notes for periods ranging from a minimum of six months to a minimum of two yearsfrom July 1.

Note distributors like ABN Amro, DBS Bank, Maybank, DMG and UOB Kay Hian will have to stop dealing in and providing advice for new structured notes, for six months, or until they have implemented adequate measures to address their failings or whichever is later.

They also have to appoint an external party - to be approved by MAS - to review their action plan, and also appoint a member from its senior management to ensure compliance.

Similarly, CIMB, Kim Eng, OCBC Securities and Philip Securities have also been told to stop dealing in and providing advise for new structured notes, for one year from July 1.

Hong Leong Finance received the heaviest penalty - it cannot sell new structured notes for a minimum of two years.

OCBC Securities was ordered by MAS to stop using introducers to provide advice for new structured notes for good.

Ten financial institutions sold over $660 million worth of Lehman-linked investments to more than 10,000 investors, who bought Lehman Minibonds, DBS High Notes 5 and Merrill Lynch Jubilee Series 3 LinkEarner Notes.

THE 10 FIs banned from selling new structured products are:

1. ABN Amro Bank Singapore Branch - Minimum 6 months

2. DBS Bank - Minimum 6 months

3. Maybank - Minimum 6 months

4. DMG & Partners Securities - Minimum 6 months

5. UOB Kay Hian - Minimum 6 months

6. CIMB-GK Securities - Minimum one year

7. Kim Eng Securities - Minimum one year

8. OCBC Securities - Minimum one year

9. Philip Securities - Minimum one year

10. Hong Leong Finance - Minimum two years

Source.

 

Structured Deposit

No Comment - Post a comment

Ever since the Minibond, High Notes etc saga, many people were skeptical when heard about the product called Structure Deposit (yours truly included). This is not surprising given the horror news on the front page of newspaper daily few months ago saying the tens of thousands of dollars vanished just like that.

My mum was intending to place a FD with OCBC today (don't ask my why OCBC). If you are in the loop, news mentioned about the decrease of our mere 0.25% interest rate on savings account to 0.125% now. As a consequence, rates on FD were affected as well. She wanted a higher interest saving account but at low risk; hence the lady recommend her a SD.

Due to the SD saga, many rules were implemented in the advisory and selling business. One of them is, inter alia, the requirement of at least an 'O' Level education before the customer is able to buy SD product. Therefore, I was called to make a trip down to help her as she only possess a Primary school education certificate.

After doing a brief 30min research, I went down with a skeptical mindset. In my mind, I was already contemplating investing in Index Fund from Lion Global for her. Long story short, after a good 15min of introduction of product by the lady, I decided to give the green light for my mum.

Details about the SD
1) Capital Guaranteed if held to maturity
2) Guaranteed effective interest of 1.55%pa (Compared to 0.75% for FD)
3) Maximum effective interest of 2.05% (The difference is subjected to the performance of the underlying share)
4) 4 years tenor
5) Underlying share was SPC

Surprisingly, the SD factsheet was easy to understand (for me at least), nothing complicated anywhere. Of course, given the low interest rate environment now, this OCBC product is the best available to risk-adverse investors. If your risk appetite is a little larger, most probably you would be better off if you invest in SPC directly given that it gives higher yield at current price and you stand a good chance of capital appreciation in 4 years' time.

Of course, you might argue that the mere 1 to 2 percent will still result in negative real interest rate but hey its the best available according to my mum's risk profile. :)

N.B The minimum subscription is $5000 and the offer period ends on the 2nd to 3rd week of July. Email me if you are interested, I can pass you the contact.

 

Goodbye, Rich

No Comment - Post a comment

Richard Stanley's death has shocked and saddened so many, even those outside DBS. -- ST PHOTO: ALBERT SIM

ONE day, on his way in to work, Richard Stanley was stopped at the DBS Tower One lobby by a new security guard who did not recognise who he was.

Instead of flying off the handle, the late chief executive of DBS Bank simply gave the guard a wink and a big pat on the shoulder, before passing him his namecard with a hearty laugh.

Stories like these - related to The Sunday Times by a DBS manager - represent what the bank, South-east Asia's largest lender, will miss most about the affable 48-year-old American, who insisted that people should just call him 'Rich'.

'His sincerity has touched many,' said Mr Eric Ang, head of capital markets and a long-time stalwart of the bank. 'With trust and friendship as his hallmark, he won the respect and admiration of many who rallied behind him.'

Added another bank employee: 'Rich came across as a more personable CEO. During staff townhall meetings, he would share anecdotes about his family and throw in some Singlish for laughs.'

This was a contrast to his predecessor - fellow American Jackson Tai - whom many DBS staff described as being 'all business.'

It also explains the hundreds of get-well messages Mr Stanley received from staff when news of his illness broke in January, and why his death has shocked and saddened so many, even those outside DBS.

Within hours of the news of his death, the chiefs of local banking rivals United Overseas Bank and OCBC Bank both offered deep condolences.

Long time friends and former colleagues like Citigroup chiefs Piyush Gupta and Jonathan Larsen said they knew him as a fighter and were confident he would overcome his illness.

In fact, just days after he was admitted for treatment in January, colleagues said they saw a set of free-weights in his hospital ward - a sign that the native New Yorker was not going down without a fight.

Source.

Not too sure what kind of CEO Rich was when he was alive. Now then hes gone, looks like DBS really lost a good personal leader.

 

5 Years Endowment Plan @ 2.25% p.a

No Comment - Post a comment

Got this recommendation from my friend who works at some financial institution. Minimal amount is SGD$20k and its Capital Guaranteed (Not Protection so rest assured its safe). It also offers life insurance protection with no medical underwriting. Email me if you are interested, can pass you my friend's contact.

Cheers.

 

Singapore Budget 2009

No Comment - Post a comment

Simplified version of the summary of Singapore Budget 2009. Some of the main points that will affect me (us) are in bold below.

The Singapore government has unveiled a S$20.5 billion Resilience Package to save jobs, help businesses and enhance competitiveness. The highly expansionary Budget will result in a S$8.7 billion deficit - the country's largest ever.

Finance Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam in unveiling the budget said the government will dip into the reserves to draw S$4.9 billion to fund two temporary and extraordinary measures - Jobs Credit and a Special Risk-Sharing Initiative.

The Jobs Credit scheme provides every employer with cash grants amounting to 12 per cent of the first S$2,500 of an employee's wage, while the Special Risk-Sharing Initiative will help viable companies get funding and keep jobs.

The Budget also sees corporate income tax down to 17 per cent effective from Year of Assessment 2010.

To give additional support to Singaporean households and the community during this economic downturn, GST Credits for households are being doubled, additional rebates given for rentals and service and conservancy charges in public housing.

In terms of personal tax, there will be a 20 per cent income tax rebate for individual tax payers, capped at S$2,000, and a 40 per cent property tax rebate for owner-occupied homes.

Source.
Watch the video here.
Speech can be read here.

 

Visual Guide to the Financial Crisis

No Comment - Post a comment



Credits to mint.com

 

Story from a Singaporean being laid off on Wall Street

2 comments - Post a comment

A very wise manager of mine once said to me, “There will always be those who should not have been let go, but were, and those who should be let go, but weren’t.” I didn’t realise then that one day I would have to draw strength from his words.

In 2004, I came to the USA from Singapore for college, and like many others from Asia, I was extremely excited at the prospect of being in the epicentre of global finance. Being female, the only child of doting parents from a traditional middle-class Chinese family, I wanted to prove to my mum and dad that I could stick it out on my own.

I am extremely grateful to my parents for being supportive and for standing up to my extended family for the choice I made to spend a handsome sum to study abroad. My parents believed in my potential and it strengthened my resolve to provide a blissful retirement for them. To save on tuition fees, I crammed in more classes and graduated in three years.

After snagging an internship and then a job offer at a Wall Street investment bank, hopes were high that my career was set and that I had achieved my goal. I would work 15-hour days, was frequently the last to leave, and was usually in the office at weekends: all part of my rite of passage as the only analyst in my team.

However long the hours might have been, the silver lining was always that I was young, starting my career in New York, and was basically being paid to learn among experienced bankers. I was living comfortably and was able to send a good portion of my pay back to my parents.

Unfortunately, when the markets turned sour earlier this year, and US banks went bust or merged, my whole team was basically let go.

News of my layoff was unexpected – I even got lost on my way to human resources to collect my documents. I felt a whirl of problems overwhelming me. Rent? Visa? Parents? My mental maths told me that my savings could last until my lease expired next July, but my visa would only last till January.

In the past, my dad had mentioned retiring next year, but recently he had told me he would like to work for another few years. Maybe he saw this coming. It absolutely wrenched me that there might be the slightest possibility that he had changed his mind because he was concerned about finances, about me.

As much as my American colleagues tried to console me that the whole banking industry is in trouble, I hesitated to share my deeper concerns, due to cultural and socio-economic differences. I wasn’t even sure if I could confide in my Asian peers, many of whom came from much cushier backgrounds.

It has been about two weeks since I began my job search, and I have had two interviews. While I am open to international relocation, I am still focusing my search on the States, for a few reasons: 1) my lease expires in July 2009 and it will be hard to find a replacement tenant; 2) moving back to Singapore would likely be a one-way ticket if I do not pursue an MBA; 3) jobs in the finance industry in Asia are also in decline and banks there have been cutting staff; 4) I am still hopeful to be able to work on a variety of transactions, involving sophisticated investors, which are often harder to come by in Asia. However, in this economic climate, my job search is on a global basis and I will relocate in accordance to need.

However, in the grand scheme of life, my problems are still nothing compared to those of people with children and mortgages. Despite my anguish, there is still a lot to be thankful for. A silver lining, that’s what we could all hope for.

Source.

 

Rescue measures and how they work

No Comment - Post a comment

Governments around the world are recapitalising banks, injecting liquidity into the markets and lowering interest rates. I'm confused. How are each of these measures different and how do they help?

RECAPITALISING

· What is it? The central bank buys shares in a bank. This gives the latter more capital, or more money to spend, in return for some commitments it must fulfil. The central bank effectively gets an ownership stake in the bank.

· Who's doing it? Widely regarded as the best tool available. Countries are adopting variations of this, with central banks in Britain and Europe requiring the banks to accept their money.

In the United States, the government is encouraging banks to ask for money on a voluntary basis.

· How effective is it? Right now, it seems to be working. Stock markets rebounded when central banks in Europe, the US and Japan announced they would adopt this plan. The British government has already bought stakes in the Royal Bank of Scotland and HBOS and Lloyds TSB.

· How much will it cost? The US will use US$250 billion (S$365 billion), while the UK, France and Germany have pledged some ¥150 billion.

GUARANTEEING LENDING

· What is it? The central bank will ensure, for a period of time, that any money lent by a bank will be protected so that even if the borrower defaults on the loan, the bank will get its money back.

· Who's doing it? Again different variations of this are being adopted. Central banks in Europe are guaranteeing lending between banks. The US Federal Deposit Insurance

Corp is guaranteeing all new bank debt for a fee and all small business deposits. Australia, New Zealand and Hong Kong will guarantee all bank deposits.

· How effective is it? Experts expect this move to finally unfreeze the credit markets.

· How much will it cost? Germany has set aside ¥400 billion (S$799 billion), France some ¥320 billion and Spain ¥100 billion.

INJECTING LIQUIDITY

· What is it? The central bank provides more funds to banks by lending to them.

· Who's doing it? Most central banks, even Singapore's, have done it recently at different times, in efforts to encourage banks to lend to one another.

· How effective is it? Has not boosted lending between banks because the fundamental problem of confidence was not addressed.

Libor and Sibor interest rates, an indication of overnight lending, stayed high. Banks simply held on to the money or would put it in safe assets like US treasuries.

CUTTING INTEREST RATES

· What is it? Cutting the cost of borrowing from banks.

· Who did it? On Oct 8, in an unprecedented move, the US Federal Reserve, the European Central Bank, the Bank of England and central banks in Canada, Switzerland and Sweden cut lending rates by 50 basis points. Other central banks have since followed.

· How effective is it? The move sent a good signal that central banks were prepared to work together, though credit markets stayed clogged. But interest rate cuts are a tried and tested means of boosting growth in a flagging economy as they help to spur new spending or investment. The International Monetary Fund expects global growth to slow to 3 per cent next year. With more countries facing slowing growth, further interest rate cuts seem likely.

ROBIN CHAN

 

DBS layoffs: Taken by surprise?

1 comments - Post a comment

A rather good article written by Conrad Raj aka Editor-At-Large.

SINGAPORE : For the second time in less than a decade DBS Holdings, the listed parent of DBS Bank and the island’s largest financial institution, has announced plans to reduce its staff strength - this time by more than 900 people, or 6 per cent of its total workforce.

The move appears to have taken most people, especially the staff, by surprise because, although the bank reported a sharp decline in earnings for the third quarter, it did not plunge into the red nor is it likely to do so in the final quarter.

Unlike the previous retrenchment exercise when some 200 staff were axed in Singapore in 2001, this time the cuts are across the board and affect personnel both in Singapore and Hong Kong.

In 2001 the bank’s broking arm, DBS Vickers Securities, also retrenched some 250 people following the integration of the operations of DBS Securities, Vickers Ballas and Lum Chang Securities.

And between 2001 and 2002, Mr Wee Cho Yaw’s United Overseas Bank let go 435 staff following its merger with Overseas Union Bank. After OCBC Bank absorbed KeppelTatLee Bank, it got rid of some 200 people.

So, while the previous layoffs were the result of integrating acquired institutions, this appears to be the first time DBS is involved in a mass layoff as a result of a global economic downturn.

Chief executive Richard Stanley told reporters at a briefing on its operating results: “To be a streamlined organisation, I believe we must run a tighter ship.”

The cuts are being made despite staff costs in Singapore and Hong Kong having fallen substantially from both the previous quarter and the corresponding period a year ago.

Could the lay-offs have been avoided? What other measures did the group look at before deciding to take the present drastic action?

The bank earned S$402 million in net profits for the quarter ended September 31: 38 per cent less than the corresponding 2007 quarter. And in the first nine months of the year net profits were off only 13 per cent to the S$1.67 billion from a year ago.

As UOB told TODAY about its manpower policies: “The bank (UOB) will continue to be disciplined in managing its cost. And in managing our expense, we will examine all avenues, including staff cost. In general, there are many avenues to manage staff cost. Some avenues could include, inter alia, smaller or no built-in increment, our performance linked bonuses, re-deployment of staff, through attrition etc. Job cuts are considered only as a last resort.”

Were the above measures considered by DBS Bank’s management? Or were they more concerned in increasing the bottomline and maintaining profit margins than in protecting jobs?

And who are the ones that are going to be laid off at DBS? Are they going to be the so-called non-performers, the underperformers, or those that led DBS into its unfortunate encounter with the Lehman Brothers Mini-Bonds and the DBS High Notes 2 and 5?

Those at the receiving end will feel unfairly treated if those responsible for the S$70 million that DBS has to put aside to meet its structured notes obligations and the ensuing adverse publicity are retained, while they are given the pink slips.

DBS will not be the last company to retrench staff here. The current global downturn, which has been exacerbated by a credit crunch. Many may even drown under the “financial tsunami”, as the event is being described by some.

For sure, some cutbacks in staff by companies cannot be avoided. But why is streamlining done only during a downturn? Why can’t companies here run a tight ship even in good times, so that the chances of resorting to lay-offs and retrenchment are slimmer? Too many companies here go on a hiring binge in good times. This has got to stop.

Source.

 

DBS cuts 900 jobs, reports 38% fall in Q3 profit

No Comment - Post a comment

SINGAPORE: Singapore's DBS Group, Southeast Asia's biggest bank by assets, said on Friday it would be laying off 900 staff to trim costs amid the global credit crisis. The bank also reported a drop in third quarter net profit.

Chief executive Richard Stanley said most of the cuts, which would be carried out at the end of the month, will come from its offices in Singapore and Hong Kong and will account for 6 per cent of the workforce. He added that this was the largest lay offs ever.

The job cut will be across all businesses and all levels. The bank did not want to specify if the affected staff would come from DBS or POSBank.

Laid off staff will be paid the equivalent of one month's salary for every year of service as per market practice.
More.

 

Warren Buffett Tops Magazine's List of Most Generous American Billionaires

1 comments - Post a comment

Warren Buffett is the nation's most generous billionaire, according to a new ranking by Condé Nast's Portfolio Magazine.

The November issue includes a list of the "50 wealthiest donors and their gifts," ranked by who is "giving the most, relative to their wealth."

Buffett comes in at number one, with $46.1 billion in donations between 2002 and 2006. Most of that, of course, comes from his pledge to give away the bulk of his fortune to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

Gates is number two on the magazine's list.

Rupert Murdoch of News Corp. is last on the list in the 50th position, with no gifts disclosed between 2002 and 2008.

Source.

 

S'pore to guarantee all Singdollar, foreign currency deposits

No Comment - Post a comment

SINGAPORE: The Singapore government said it would guarantee all Singdollar and foreign currency deposits of individual and non-bank customers in licensed banks, finance companies and merchant banks.

The Monetary Authority of Singapore and the Ministry of Finance said the guarantee of up to S$150 billion will be well in excess of possible liabilities arising from the failure of any financial institution.

The guarantee takes immediate effect and will remain in place until 31 December 2010. It will also be extended to deposits placed with credit co-operatives registered with the Registry of Co-operative Societies.

Currently, there are 41 credit co-operatives providing thrift and loan services to more than 200,000 members.

The guarantee will be backed by S$150 billion of the reserves of the Singapore government.

The move follows similar action by governments around the world in recent days as they sought to deal with the current global financial crisis.

Singapore has assured that its banking system continues to be sound and resilient, but it said precautionary action must be taken to avoid an erosion of the banks' deposit base and to ensure a level international playing field for banks in Singapore.

The total amount of deposits in Singapore is understood to be valued at about S$700 billion.

Ministry of Finance and Monetary Authority of Singapore Joint Press Statement.

Source.

 

Singapore economy in recession

No Comment - Post a comment

SINGAPORE (AFP) — Singapore's trade-sensitive economy has declined for a second straight quarter, the government said Friday, meaning the city-state has entered a recession for the first time in six years.

On a seasonally adjusted quarter-on-quarter annualised basis, real GDP declined by 6.3 percent in the third quarter after contracting 5.7 percent in the previous quarter, estimates from the Ministry of Trade and Industry said.

It did not describe the economy as being in recession, but a technical recession is generally defined as two consecutive quarters of quarter-on-quarter contractions in economic output.

Economists polled by Dow Jones Newswires had forecast a 0.3 percent quarter-on-quarter rise in gross domestic product (GDP), the value of goods and services produced in the economy.

Singapore's last technical recession occurred in 2002, and the most recent full-scale recession was in 2001 when the economy contracted 2.4 percent during the year.


Source.

 

Obama and McCain's pick for their Treasury Sec

No Comment - Post a comment




Not surprise.

 

Warren Buffett's Three Rules for Investing In a Crisis

No Comment - Post a comment

1. "Cash combined with courage in a crisis is priceless"

2. "Dont invest in things you don't understand"

3. "Don't try to catch a falling knife until you have a handle on the risk"

Source.

 

Warren Buffett Casts Vote of Confidence In General Electric With $3B Investment

1 comments - Post a comment

Warren Buffett is making a $3 billion investment in General Electric in a vote of confidence designed to ease global market fears about the health of its GE Capital unit. He calls GE the "backbone" of American industry.

Today's Buffett deal is very similar to his backing of Goldman Sachs through a similar $5 billion investment. Like the Goldman investment, he's getting very favorable terms.

In a live telephone interview from his jet, Buffett told our Becky Quick that he's seeing more investment opportunities as prices come down. He also repeated his prediction that Congress will pass legislation to help stabilize the nation's credit markets. If not, he predicts we'll have "terrible, terrible, terrible problems."

Source.

One thing we need to know is that with both the Goldman and GE deals, hes getting deals that are far more favorable than any tom and cat would get on the street, wall or main. Hence, it really gives us, the investors, really little confidence as claimed.

 

The Story of Chance & the Garden

No Comment - Post a comment

A very encouraging story extracted from the letter written by Christopher Tan, Chief Executive Officer, Providend.

Chance is a man who has grown to middle age living in a solitary room in a rich man’s mansion, bereft of contact with other human beings. He has two all-consuming interests: Watching television and tending the garden outside his room.

When the mansion’s owner dies, Chance wanders out on his first foray into the world. He is hit by the limousine of a powerful industrialist who is an adviser to the president. When he is rushed to the industrialist’s estate for medical care, he identifies himself only as “Chance the gardener.” In the confusion, his name quickly becomes “Chauncey Gardiner.”

When the President visits the industrialist, the recuperating Chance sits in on the meeting. The economy is slumping; America’s bluechip corporations are under stress; the stock market is crashing. Unexpectedly, Chance is asked for his advice: Chance shrank. He felt the roots of his thoughts had been suddenly yanked out of their wet earth and thrust, tangled, into the unfriendly air. He stared at the carpet. Finally, he spoke: “In a garden, “he said, “growth has it season. There are spring and summer, but there are also fall and winter. And then spring and summer again. As long as the roots are not severed, all is well and all will be well.”


He slowly raises his eyes, and sees that the President seems quietly pleased-indeed, delighted –by his response. “I must admit, Mr. Gardiner, that is one of the most refreshing and optimistic statements I have heard in a very, very long time. Many of us forget that nature and society are one. Like nature, our economic system remains, in the long run, stable and rational, and that’s why we must not fear to be at its mercy….we welcome the inevitable seasons of nature, yet we are upset by the seasons of our economy! How foolish of us.